MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2946713807

インタビュー:去勢抵抗性前立腺がん(CRPC)の治療と現状

2019· article· ja· W2946713807 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
鈴木 啓悦

Bibliographic record

VenuePharma Medica · 2019
Typearticle
Languageja
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEstrogen and related hormone effects
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

去勢抵抗性前立腺がん(CRPC)の治療薬として,『前立腺癌診療ガイドライン2016年版』では,従来から用いられてきたドセタキセルに加え,2014年に登場した化学療法薬のカバジタキセル,CYP17A阻害薬であるアビラテロンおよびアンドロゲン受容体(AR)シグナル伝達路を標的としたAR標的薬であるエンザルタミドの4剤が推奨グレードAで推奨されている。さらに,近い将来,日本においても新たなAR標的薬であるapalutamide,darolutamideの臨床応用が予想されている。このようにCRPCに対して有効な治療選択肢が増える一方,これらの薬剤をどのような患者にどのような順番で投与すればよいのか(逐次療法)についてはコンセンサスが得られていない。そこで,これまでに得られているエビデンスや診療ガイドラインを踏まえ,CRPCの治療の現状や課題,今後の展望について,東邦大学医療センター佐倉病院泌尿器科教授の鈴木先生にお話を伺った。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePharma MedicaSame topicEstrogen and related hormone effectsFrench-language works237,207