MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2946722705 · doi:10.4000/books.cths.1178

Gabriel Hanotaux, un historien dans l’action : le Comité du secours national et le Comité de secours de l’Aisne pendant la Première Guerre mondiale

2017· book-chapter· fr· W2946722705 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Martine Plouvier

Bibliographic record

VenueÉditions du Comité des travaux historiques et scientifiques eBooks · 2017
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gabriel Hanotaux est vice-président du Comité du secours national, fondé le 4 août 1914 sous le patronage du président de la République. Il crée le Comité du secours national de l’Aisne et en prend la présidence. Il voyage dans l’Aisne, dresse un état des urgences : approvisionnement en blé, en charbon, imminence de la campagne betteravière, secours à apporter aux femmes, nécessité de vestiaires, de repas, de relogement, d’allumettes, de sel et de sucre, d’essence pour le transport. Il rend compte au Comité national et au gouvernement à Bordeaux, se met en relation avec la Commission for Relief in Belgium (le CRB), le Comité France-Amérique, les banques américaines (Morgan, etc.), les Canadiens, l’Espagne, pour organiser l’achat, le transport et la distribution. Grâce aux carnets personnels de l’historien (en partie inédits) et à quelques dossiers d’archives, il est possible d’appréhender le réseau international qui a permis cette action au service des plus démunis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.201
Threshold uncertainty score0.399

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0100.007
Scholarly communication0.0070.007
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0050.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉditions du Comité des travaux historiques et scientifiques eBooksSame topicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207