MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2946724990

Optimizing movement performance with altered sensation

2013· article· en· W2946724990 on OpenAlexaffabout
Cheryl M. Glazebrook, Ran Zheng, Kayla Duna, Alyson Gysel, Steven Passmore

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Exercise, Movement, and Sport (SCAPPS refereed abstracts repository) · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMuscle activation and electromyography studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysical medicine and rehabilitationContext (archaeology)Somatosensory systemSensationRepeated measures designMedicineSensory systemRandomized controlled trialRehabilitationMovement (music)Physical therapyPsychologyNeuroscienceSurgery
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Somatosensory feedback provides information about ongoing performance and success of movements. Individuals who experience disrupted somatosensory feedback are often faced with re-learning basic goal-directed movements. The present experiment assessed the impact of induced paresthesia, in an otherwise healthy nervous system, on movement performance. Sixteen healthy young (10 females, M age = 21.7) participants attended two sessions on two separate days and completed four conditions: paresthsia/no paresthesia and vision/no vision of the target. Order of the four conditions and associated target locations were blocked and counterbalanced across participants. Paresthesia was induced using a constant current stimulator and confirmed with standardized sensory testing. Participants performed 100 trials per condition and were motivated to improve their movement time (MT) by providing incentive for accurate movements with associated shorter MTs. Movements were recorded using a 3D motion analysis system (300Hz) and analyzed using a 2 (paresthesia condition) by 2 (vision condition) by 2 (early/ late performance) repeated measures ANOVA. Analyses revealed no significant differences for reaction time or constant error. Although MT and time to peak velocity (ttPV) improved with practice, paresthesia led to significantly longer MTs and ttPV. A paresthesia by vision condition interaction revealed that movement endpoints were more variable without vision only when paresthesia was not present. Findings will be discussed in the context of sensorimotor integration and the implications for upper limb rehabilitation.Acknowledgments: This research was funded by the Manitoba Medical Service Foundation, the Manitoba Health Research Council, and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. The authors would like to thank Leah Harpelle, Kelsey Brown, and Michele Berthelette for their assistance with target set-up, data collection, data organization, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Exercise, Movement, and Sport (SCAPPS refereed abstracts repository)Same topicMuscle activation and electromyography studiesFrench-language works237,207