Proteasomal Inhibition Redirects the PrP-Like Shadoo Protein to the Nucleus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Shadoo protein (Sho) exhibits homology to the hydrophobic region of the cellular isoform of prion protein (PrP C ). As prion-infected brains gradually accumulate infectivity-associated isoforms of prion protein (PrP Sc ), levels of mature endogenous Sho become reduced. To study the regulatory effect of the proteostatic network on Sho expression, we investigated the action of lactacystin, MG132, NH 4 Cl, and 3-methyladenine (3-MA) in two cell culture models. In primary mixed neuronal and glial cell cultures (MNGCs) from transgenic mice expressing wild-type Sho from the PrP gene promoter (Tg. Sprn mice), lactacystin- and MG132-mediated inhibition of proteasomal activity shifted the repertoire of Sho species towards unglycosylated forms appearing in the nuclei; conversely, the autophagic modulators NH 4 Cl and 3-MA did not affect Sho or PrP C glycosylation patterns. Mouse N2a neuroblastoma cells expressing Sho under control of a housekeeping gene promoter treated with MG132 or lactacystin also showed increased nuclear localization of unglycosylated Sho. As two proteasomal inhibitors tested in two cell paradigms caused redirection of Sho to nuclei at the expense of processing through the secretory pathway, our findings define a balanced shift in subcellular localization that thereby differs from the decreases in net Sho species seen in prion-infected brains. Our data are indicative of a physiological pathway to access Sho functions in the nucleus under conditions of impaired proteasomal activity. We also infer that these conditions would comprise a context wherein Sho’s N-terminal nucleic acid–binding RGG repeat region is brought into play.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".