MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2946747586

The Evaluation of the Neighbourhood Empowerment Team

2017· article· en· W2946747586 on OpenAlexaff
Douglas Ching Shan Hui

Bibliographic record

VenueStudent Research Proceedings · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDisaster Management and Resilience
Canadian institutionsMacEwan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeighbourhood (mathematics)EmpowermentAgency (philosophy)Safety netPublic relationsSociologyPerceptionPolitical sciencePsychologySocial scienceLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research will be evaluating the Neighbourhood Empowerment Team (NET) and will be observing changes of attitudes stakeholders have around NET and their new approach to crime prevention. NET is an agency that addresses crime prevention and community safety and has recently shifted to a new approach known as Situation Integrated Teams (SIT). In the past, NET old approach would involve the agency staying in a neighbourhood for 2-4 years to address any problems or concerns the neighbourhood had regarding crime and safety, however, due to economic pressure and the displacement of crime from neighbourhoods, NET has decided to adapt a new approach known as SIT which is project focused. Ever since the shift, NET has not officially communicated that they have shifted their approach to all their stakeholders and this research uncovers the reality and perception around NET and SIT. Discipline: Sociology Faculty Mentor: Dr. Michael Gulayets

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.021
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.491
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0210.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0060.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.215
GPT teacher head0.534
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStudent Research ProceedingsSame topicDisaster Management and ResilienceFrench-language works237,207