MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2946801714 · doi:10.11575/prism/35865

Impacts Of Nox And Sox Emissions And Regulations Form Alberta's Power Generation Industry

2012· article· en· W2946801714 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kelly Ng

Bibliographic record

VenuePRISM (University of Calgary) · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Acceptance of Renewable Energy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNOxElectric power industryBusinessEnvironmental scienceClean Air ActNatural resource economicsWaste managementAir pollutionEconomicsEngineeringChemistryElectricityCombustion

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The electricity sector is one of the largest emitters of Nitrogen Oxides (NOX) and Sulphur Dioxide (SO2) generated mainly from fossil fuel based sources. Alberta’s electricity industry is powered mainly by coal and gas making the sector one of the largest contributors of air emissions. Regulatory bodies across the country have implemented policies to set higher standards as initiatives to combat air emissions. The impacts associated with NOX and SO2 include human health issues and environmental impacts including acidification and eutrophication. Studies have shown the economic implications associated with exposure to these pollutants have cost the nation millions in health and environmental costs. This research study found Alberta emits the highest amounts of NOX and SO2, largely due to the availability of fossil fuel based natural resources and the economic development from the energy sector. In the past ten years, Alberta’s progressive initiatives have seen implementation of higher efficiency technologies, greater use of natural gas for power generation, and implementation of renewables. Alberta implemented initiatives including the climate change and emissions management act and the specified gas emitters regulation to encourage use of new technologies such as the integrated gasification combined cycle to replace existing high NOX and SO2 emitting coal facilities while sustaining the provinces energy needs. However, Alberta has yet to set a target to reduce their total overall emissions like Ontario recently implemented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.061
Threshold uncertainty score0.215

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePRISM (University of Calgary)Same topicSocial Acceptance of Renewable EnergyFrench-language works237,207