MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2946869096 · doi:10.1109/apec.2019.8722021

A Novel DC-Link Voltage Control for Small-Scale Grid-Connected Wind Energy Conversion System

2019· article· en· W2946869096 on OpenAlexaff
Guanhong Song, Bo Cao, Liuchen Chang, Riming Shao, Shuang Xu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrogrid Control and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWind powerGridComputer scienceVoltageLink (geometry)Electrical engineeringEngineeringComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposed a novel DC-link voltage control method for small-scale grid-connected three-phase power converters in variable-speed wind energy conversion systems to minimize the fluctuation in the DC-link voltage caused by wind power variations. In a typical three-phase PWM converter, DC-link capacitors are normally used as an energy buffer to balance the power difference between the input and output, but the voltage across the capacitors varies significantly under rapidly changing working conditions. Hence, a proper DC-link voltage control is essential to perform fast DC-link voltage regulation to minimize these fluctuations. The proposed DC-link voltage control method estimates the input power of the converter using a state observer and integrates with a conventional PI controller, combining the advantages of the robustness of a PI controller and the fast-transient response and disturbance rejection capability offered by the observer-based feed-forward compensation but without additional measurement components. The comparison between the proposed control algorithm and a conventional PI controller is presented in both simulations and experiments in this paper to verify the effectiveness and the advantages of the proposed observer-based DC-link control algorithm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.971
Threshold uncertainty score0.690

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.153
Teacher spread0.149 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMicrogrid Control and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207