MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2946914697 · doi:10.1109/temc.2019.2915340

Integrated Massively Parallel Simulation of Thermo-Electromagnetic Fields and Transients of Converter Transformer Interacting With MMC in Multi-Terminal DC Grid

2019· article· en· W2946914697 on OpenAlexafffund
Peng Liu, Ning Lin, Venkata Dinavahi

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHVDC Systems and Fault Protection
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsTransformerGridMassively parallelElectromagnetic compatibilityTerminal (telecommunication)Electronic engineeringElectrical engineeringComputer scienceElectromagnetic fieldPhysicsVoltageEngineeringParallel computingTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A computationally efficient model to study the transient interaction of the finite-element (FE) converter transformer with modular multi-level converter (MMC) can provide the advanced knowledge of the filed-circuit interactions that can be utilized for the design and test of equipment; however, the runtime of existing simulation tools developed for CPU execution usually takes days or even weeks, which is prohibitively long. In this paper, an integrated thermo-electromagnetic model is proposed for the transient simulation of FE-based transformer interacting with the MMC in a multi-terminal dc gird, with the magnetic field, thermal field, and electrical networks fully coupled. The transmission-line modeling solution is employed for the nonlinear FE problem, and each MMC is split into a number of minimum possible circuits, so that the codes can be sufficiently parallelized and implemented on the graphics processing unit with thousands of Cuda cores to be runtime friendly. The integrated model can provide the transient field distributions within the transformer and the device-level information of the MMC such as switching transients and junction temperatures. Compared with a commercial software package, the execution time of 105time-steps decreased from several days to only hours with a speedup of more than 47 times while maintaining high accuracy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic CompatibilitySame topicHVDC Systems and Fault ProtectionFrench-language works237,207