Antioxidant capacity and hepatoprotective activity of myristic acid acylated derivative of phloridzin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The antioxidant activities in vitro and hepatoprotective effects against carbon tetrachloride (CCl 4 ) induced acute liver injury in vivo of myristic acid acylated derivative of phloridzin (PZM) were investigated. The PZM was obtained by enzymatic acylation of myristic acid and phloridzin (PZ). The antioxidant capability of PZM in vitro was evaluated by the ferric reducing antioxidant power assay (FRAP), 2,2′-Azinobis- 3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulphonate (ABTS + ·) and 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH·) radical scavenging assay. Mice were intragastrically treated with control or PZM (20, 40, and 80 mg/kg) for 5 days and intra-peritoneal injection with CCl 4 . The enzymatic acylated synthesis of myristic acid and phloridzin was region-selective taken place on 6″-OH of phloridzin glycoside moiety and achieved 93% yield. PZM had a significantly higher total antioxidant ability, same scavenging ABTS + · ability and weaker scavenging DPPH· ability when compared to the parent PZ. The of aminotransferase serum activity and malondialdehyde hepatic activity were elevated (P < 0.015) after treatment with CCl 4 , while the related liver enzymatic activities and glutathione concentration were lower. These changes were enhanced by PZM. Further studies showed that PZM reduced the interleukin-6 expression and stimulated liver regeneration caused by CCl 4 . PZM attained good antioxidant capacity in vitro and had excellent hepatoprotective effects in vivo and better bioactivity compared to the parent phloridzin. The significance of hepatoprotective effect of phloridzin derivative against CCl 4 -induced hepatotoxicity in mice is an important and new finding.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".