Pratiques d’enseignantes de maternelle 5 ans à l’égard de l’aménagement de centres de littératie pour soutenir l’émergence de l’écrit des enfants
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article s’intéresse aux interventions directes et indirectes à l’égard de l’aménagement de trois centres de littératie, soit les coins lecture, écriture et jeu symbolique, afin de soutenir l’émergence de l’écrit des enfants à l’éducation préscolaire 5 ans. Il est maintenant bien reconnu dans les écrits scientifiques que l’enseignante joue un rôle important pour favoriser et soutenir l’émergence de l’écrit des jeunes enfants (Bodrova et Leong, 2012; Tracey et Morrow, 2015). Ainsi, c’est en agissant tant sur l’environnement physique (interventions indirectes) que psychologique (interventions directes) qu’elle favorise le développement optimal de l’émergence de l’écrit des enfants (Guo, Justice, Kaderavek et McGinty, 2012). Dans le cadre de cet article, ces deux types d’interventions seront définis et les études portant sur l’état des pratiques d’enseignantes de maternelle 5 ans à ce sujet seront présentées.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".