MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2946931672 · doi:10.1109/jsen.2019.2919899

A Novel Subspace Approach for Bearing-Only Target Localization

2019· article· en· W2946931672 on OpenAlexafffund
Ji‐An Luo, Xuehui Shao, Dongliang Peng, Xiao–Ping Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Sensors Journal · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSubspace topologyBearing (navigation)AlgorithmScalar (mathematics)Dimension (graph theory)Nonlinear systemUpper and lower boundsComputer scienceMathematicsMatrix (chemical analysis)Noise (video)Signal subspaceMathematical optimizationApplied mathematicsArtificial intelligenceMathematical analysisGeometryCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new subspace method is proposed to solve the bearing-only target localization (BOTL) problem. Instead of linearizing the nonlinear bearing equations to form least-squares optimization, we construct a scalar product matrix by making full use of all bearing and intersensor bearing geometric information. After exploiting the dimension and eigenstructure of the scalar product matrix, we devise a subspace algorithm for BOTL with its weights computed from a prior location estimate. Simulation results show that the proposed algorithm achieves a mean square error performance close to the Cramér-Rao lower bound, even at high noise levels. Field experiments demonstrate the superiority of the proposed algorithm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Sensors JournalSame topicIndoor and Outdoor Localization TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207