MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2946971437 · doi:10.4000/books.pusl.11343

Die literarische Karriere des Mesmerismus in Deutschland zwischen 1800 und 1850

2001· book-chapter· de· W2946971437 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languagede
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicGerman Literature and Culture Studies
Canadian institutionsTrinity College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wer über die literarische Karriere des Mesmerismus im 19. Jahrhundert zu sprechen hat, kann über dessen wissenschaftsgeschichtliches Schicksal im 18. Jahrhundert nicht schweigen. Die außerordentliche Faszination, mit der der tierische Magnetismus oder Mesmerismus als Heilkonzept zwischen Medizin, Psychotherapie, religiöser Offenbarung und Scharlatanerie mitsamt seinem naturphilosophischem Begründungszusammenhang in der deutschen literarischen Romantik rezipiert wurde, ist ohne seine kontrover...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.945
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGerman Literature and Culture StudiesFrench-language works237,207