MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2947023550 · doi:10.4000/books.pus.14511

L’éthicisation du droit en matière religieuse : application à la circoncision rituelle

2016· book-chapter· fr· W2947023550 on OpenAlexaff
Stéphane Bernatchez

Bibliographic record

VenuePresses universitaires de Strasbourg eBooks · 2016
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMulticulturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Telle qu’elle est ici posée, la question ne consiste pas à déterminer si la circoncision rituelle, ou son interdiction, est éthique ou non, mais plutôt de savoir quelle éthique est en cause derrière tel ou tel choix, derrière tel ou tel argument. Il n’y a pas de sens à parler d’une action ou d’une décision qui serait contraire à l’éthique, puisqu’une action ou une décision mobilise toujours une éthique ; la question est plutôt de savoir laquelle. L’éthique est plutôt envisagée ici comme « une...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.898
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePresses universitaires de Strasbourg eBooksSame topicMulticulturalism, Politics, Migration, GenderFrench-language works237,207