91 The associations between sleep disturbances and psychological and somatic symptoms in adolescents
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Growing evidence suggests that sleep plays a crucial role in healthy adolescent development. Despite the potentially serious implications of inadequate sleep on the development and well-being of young individuals, to date, the daytime correlates of sleep disturbances in the adolescent population remains a relatively understudied and unappreciated area of investigation. The objective of this study was to investigate the associations between sleep disturbances and psychological and somatic symptoms in Canadian adolescents. Participants: 62 adolescents between the ages of 13–18 (M=14.76, SD=1.21). Insomnia symptoms and reported sleep disturbances were measured using the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), respectively. Psychological and somatic symptoms were measured using both the Youth Self-Report (YSR) and the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL). Partial correlational analyses, adjusting for potential confounds of age and gender, revealed significant associations between ISI total scores and both the internalizing and somatic subscales of the YSR and CBCL. Significant associations were also found between the sleep disturbances subscale of the PSQI and the internalizing and externalizing subscales of the YSR, as well as the internalizing subscale of the CBCL. Despite being understudied, there is a significant prevalence of daytime correlates of sleep disturbances among adolescents. Symptoms of insomnia and poor sleep quality are associated with both internalizing and somatic problems. As such, pediatricians and health care providers may benefit from considering sleep disturbances when assessing and/or treating psychological and somatic symptoms in adolescents.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".