MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2947091483 · doi:10.1080/03155986.2019.1607806

An improved tabu search algorithm for the petrol-station replenishment problem with adjustable demands

2019· article· en· W2947091483 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueINFOR Information Systems and Operational Research · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicle Routing Optimization Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTabu searchBenchmark (surveying)Computer scienceMathematical optimizationStatisticProcess (computing)GasolineOperations researchVehicle routing problemOrder (exchange)Routing (electronic design automation)AlgorithmMathematicsStatisticsEconomicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper discusses the petrol-station replenishment problem with adjustable demands (PSRP-AD). This problem originates from a practical application of fuel delivery, where the main objective is to satisfy all petrol-station demands at a minimal cost. However, the problem includes tanks with adjustable loads while respecting the agreement made between the company and the customers. This agreement allows the company to reduce the delivery up to a given threshold less than the ordered demand. For the PSRP-AD, we first describe the problem and provide the mathematical modelling that distinguishes between the loading and routing phases, followed by an improved tabu search to solve it. Within the framework of the tabu search, we embed the Kolmogorov–Smirnov statistic in the classical moves in order to speed up the search process. The results show that our solution is competitive on the benchmark instances and outperforms the current delivery method used by the company with a significant improvement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.844
Threshold uncertainty score0.941

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it