MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2947091483 · doi:10.1080/03155986.2019.1607806

An improved tabu search algorithm for the petrol-station replenishment problem with adjustable demands

2019· article· en· W2947091483 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Abdelaziz Benantar, Rachid Ouafi, Jaouad Boukachour

Bibliographic record

VenueINFOR Information Systems and Operational Research · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicle Routing Optimization Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTabu searchBenchmark (surveying)Computer scienceMathematical optimizationStatisticProcess (computing)GasolineOperations researchVehicle routing problemOrder (exchange)Routing (electronic design automation)AlgorithmMathematicsStatisticsEconomicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper discusses the petrol-station replenishment problem with adjustable demands (PSRP-AD). This problem originates from a practical application of fuel delivery, where the main objective is to satisfy all petrol-station demands at a minimal cost. However, the problem includes tanks with adjustable loads while respecting the agreement made between the company and the customers. This agreement allows the company to reduce the delivery up to a given threshold less than the ordered demand. For the PSRP-AD, we first describe the problem and provide the mathematical modelling that distinguishes between the loading and routing phases, followed by an improved tabu search to solve it. Within the framework of the tabu search, we embed the Kolmogorov–Smirnov statistic in the classical moves in order to speed up the search process. The results show that our solution is competitive on the benchmark instances and outperforms the current delivery method used by the company with a significant improvement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueINFOR Information Systems and Operational ResearchSame topicVehicle Routing Optimization MethodsFrench-language works237,207