MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2947125094 · doi:10.1353/hpn.2019.0026

Intersections of Race, Class, Gender, and Nation in Fin-de-Siècle Spanish Literature and Culture ed. by Jennifer Smith and Lisa Nalbone

2019· article· en· W2947125094 on OpenAlex
Joyce Tolliver

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueHispania · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicSpanish Literature and Culture Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubjectivityRace (biology)SociologyScholarshipGender studiesClass (philosophy)Fin de siecleSubject (documents)Field (mathematics)Representation (politics)HumanitiesAnthropologyHistoryArt historyArtEpistemologyPolitical sciencePhilosophyLawLibrary science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Intersections of Race, Class, Gender, and Nation in Fin-de-Siècle Spanish Literature and Culture ed. by Jennifer Smith and Lisa Nalbone Joyce Tolliver Smith, Jennifer, and Lisa Nalbone, editors. Intersections of Race, Class, Gender, and Nation in Fin-de-Siècle Spanish Literature and Culture. Routledge, 2017. Pp. 213. ISBN 978-1-138-20647-2. In this new addition to Routledge’s New Hispanisms series, Intersections of Race, Class, Gender, and Nation in Fin-de-Siècle Spanish Literature and Culture, Jennifer Smith and Lisa Nalbone offer a collection of recent scholarship by both well-established leaders of our profession and by emerging scholars. The theory that forms the foundation of all studies in the volume—that “subjectivity is created through simultaneously held subject positions” (1)—reflects current Anglo-American critical approaches to literary works, while also accurately reflecting our field in terms of the authors studied. Of the nine essays included in the volume, two analyze works by Galdós and four deal with works by Pardo Bazán. Although the volume features a heavy representation of analyses of works by these two canonical authors, most of the works analyzed here have received relatively little critical attention. Each of these six studies affirms the relevance of these author’s works to current concerns about the configuration of the Spanish nation and about the roles played by social class, gender, and race in that configuration. Both Margot Versteeg and Maryellen Bieder discuss Pardo Bazán’s overlooked but culturally significant play “El becerro de metal,” offering differing but compatible analyses of how this play reflects the author’s repudiation of the notion that the economic woes of post-1898 Spain could be ameliorated by repatriating Sephardic Jews. Both analyses skillfully discuss the interdependences of religion/raza, class, nation, and gender in Pardo Bazán’s play. In her examination of Pardo Bazán’s purported antisemitism, Bieder also considers Una cristiana and its sequel La prueba, placing the author’s use of the tropes of the judío within a nuanced historical context. Carmen Pereira-Muro offers a new reading of Insolación, building on previous analyses that noted echoes of Merimée’s novella and Bizet’s opera Carmen, arguing that this intertextuality works parodically to undermine both monolithic notions of Spanishness and of Spain as “a metonymic South” (198), while also offering a new affirmation of female sexual passion as a response to Merimée’s censure and silencing of Carmen’s desire. Christy Presson Shaughnessy brings to our attention the remarkable story “La sonrisa blanca,” in which, she argues, Pardo Bazán ambivalently portrays the racial conflict inherent to the historic prize-fighting boxing match between the Canadian Tommy Burns and the African-American Jack Johnson—and, by implication, expresses her own ambivalence about race, power, and masculinity. Dorca and Coffey, who have both contributed significantly in their previous work to our understanding of Galdós’s creative analyses of modern Spanish history, each show how the novelist’s historical fiction grappled with the tensions of empire. While Dorca focuses on Galdós’s understanding of the Peninsular Wars (1808–14) as constitutive of the Spanish nation—both in the heroism of the 1808 wars and in the later enabling of the repressive regime of Fernando VII—Coffey convincingly argues that Galdós portrays his [End Page 144] protagonist’s amorous relationships as allegories for Spain’s fraught relationship with its former and waning colonies. The three studies included in this volume that do not discuss works by either Galdós or Pardo Bazán serve as a welcome and necessary reminder that the period’s preoccupation with the concepts and the lived realities of race, gender, class, and nation permeated not just the intellectual sphere, but also Spanish popular culture. A particularly rich source of information about dominant conceptions of race, gender, class, and nation is found in the zarzuela, which might be considered the period’s analogue to present-day films or televised series. It is particularly appropriate, then, that both David George and Mar Soria examine how this genre represented and contributed to attitudes towards who and what constituted “lo...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.503
Threshold uncertainty score0.578

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it