MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2947141757 · doi:10.1353/hrq.2019.0039

The Right to Say No. Marital Rape and Law Reform in Canada, Ghana, Kenya and Malawi ed. by Melanie Randall, Jennifer Koshan, & Patricia Nyaundi

2019· article· en· W2947141757 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Francesca Gottardi

Bibliographic record

VenueHuman Rights Quarterly · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGender, Security, and Conflict
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCriminologyLawLegislationPublishingPolitical scienceContext (archaeology)SociologyGender studiesHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: The Right to Say No. Marital Rape and Law Reform in Canada, Ghana, Kenya and Malawied. by Melanie Randall, Jennifer Koshan, & Patricia Nyaundi Francesca Gottardi (bio) The Right to Say No. Marital Rape and Law Reform in Canada, Ghana, Kenya and Malawi( Melanie Randall, Jennifer Koshan, & Patricia Nyaundi eds., Hart Publishing 2017), ISBN: 9781782258605, v309 pages. This book explores the issue of sexual assault in marriage. According to the World Health Organization, one in three women who have been in a relationship report that they faced some form of "sexual and/or physical violence perpetrated by a husband or other male intimate." 1Despite this alarming number, many countries today do not have the legislation in place to adequately criminalize sexual assault in intimate relationships. 2In fact, for centuries women who were sexually assaulted by their spouses had no legal recourse at all. The purpose of the book is to offer a contribution to fill the legal and research gap around marital rape and to stimulate an international conversation on this important, but too often overlooked, issue. 3The book also aims to offer a critical perspective on the challenges ahead to end the legal impunity of marital rape, while also highlighting the accomplishments achieved so far. 4 The book is divided in two parts. The first part is titled "Marital Rape, Human Rights and the Law: Mapping the Issues." It provides the theoretical and legal context necessary to put the issue of spousal sexual assault into a legal and historical perspective. Part one consists of four chapters. The first chapter is introductory and presents the book and its structure to the reader. Chapter Two, authored by Melanie Randall, addresses marital rape in relation to the wider issue of domestic violence against women. Randall asserts: "Despite advances in the separate spheres of domestic violence and sexual assault, the specific problem of marital rape and sexual violence in intimate relationships remains relatively under the radar both in society and in law." 5The author effectively calls for more recognition of how intimate partner sexual violence (IPSV) is a central component of domestic violence. 6Randall also calls for greater social attention to be devoted to the issue. An interesting perspective proposed by the author is that rape is often understood to be perpetrated by a stranger, rather than a husband coercing his wife to a sexual intercourse. 7Randall adds that "stranger rapes" tend to be perceived as more severe than marital sexual assaults, given the partners' union and past consent to engage in a sexual relationship. 8For this reason, the images conjured up by domestic violence tend to be centered on physical assault, threats [End Page 540]and mental abuse, rather than on sexual violence. 9Randall skillfully backs up her argument with surveys that show how, at a community level, people tend not to perceive IPSV as domestic violence. 10Randall denounces how this separation has implications on the effectiveness of a legal response in that all the focus is on domestic violence and none on IPSV, making the latter a de factoinvisible crime. 11The consequences are multifold. First, if marital sexual violence is not perceived as amounting to an assault, it ends up being under-reported and even undetected. 12Then, if there is no criminalization of marital rape, the victims are left with no tools to find help and to counteract the long-lasting and negative physical and mental effects of IPSV. Randall brings to light how often IPSV results in consequences that are even more severe than those registered amongst victims of assaults committed by strangers. This is because IPSV victims have to face a sense of betrayal as the damage comes from a trusted loved one—someone that should protect and respect them. 13Randall goes on to address effects that are insufficiently appreciated, such as the phenomenon of revictimization, which is defined as the heightened likelihood for women who were victims of sexual abuse as children to be victims of IPSV later in life as well. 14 A thought-provoking aspect of Randall's analysis is the influence of social norms and gender expectations in women...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.967
Threshold uncertainty score0.641

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0080.006
Scholarly communication0.0090.005
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHuman Rights QuarterlySame topicGender, Security, and ConflictFrench-language works237,207