MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2947141757 · doi:10.1353/hrq.2019.0039

The Right to Say No. Marital Rape and Law Reform in Canada, Ghana, Kenya and Malawi ed. by Melanie Randall, Jennifer Koshan, & Patricia Nyaundi

2019· article· en· W2947141757 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Francesca Gottardi

Notice bibliographique

RevueHuman Rights Quarterly · 2019
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueGender, Security, and Conflict
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCriminologyLawLegislationPublishingPolitical scienceContext (archaeology)SociologyGender studiesHistory

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: The Right to Say No. Marital Rape and Law Reform in Canada, Ghana, Kenya and Malawied. by Melanie Randall, Jennifer Koshan, & Patricia Nyaundi Francesca Gottardi (bio) The Right to Say No. Marital Rape and Law Reform in Canada, Ghana, Kenya and Malawi( Melanie Randall, Jennifer Koshan, & Patricia Nyaundi eds., Hart Publishing 2017), ISBN: 9781782258605, v309 pages. This book explores the issue of sexual assault in marriage. According to the World Health Organization, one in three women who have been in a relationship report that they faced some form of "sexual and/or physical violence perpetrated by a husband or other male intimate." 1Despite this alarming number, many countries today do not have the legislation in place to adequately criminalize sexual assault in intimate relationships. 2In fact, for centuries women who were sexually assaulted by their spouses had no legal recourse at all. The purpose of the book is to offer a contribution to fill the legal and research gap around marital rape and to stimulate an international conversation on this important, but too often overlooked, issue. 3The book also aims to offer a critical perspective on the challenges ahead to end the legal impunity of marital rape, while also highlighting the accomplishments achieved so far. 4 The book is divided in two parts. The first part is titled "Marital Rape, Human Rights and the Law: Mapping the Issues." It provides the theoretical and legal context necessary to put the issue of spousal sexual assault into a legal and historical perspective. Part one consists of four chapters. The first chapter is introductory and presents the book and its structure to the reader. Chapter Two, authored by Melanie Randall, addresses marital rape in relation to the wider issue of domestic violence against women. Randall asserts: "Despite advances in the separate spheres of domestic violence and sexual assault, the specific problem of marital rape and sexual violence in intimate relationships remains relatively under the radar both in society and in law." 5The author effectively calls for more recognition of how intimate partner sexual violence (IPSV) is a central component of domestic violence. 6Randall also calls for greater social attention to be devoted to the issue. An interesting perspective proposed by the author is that rape is often understood to be perpetrated by a stranger, rather than a husband coercing his wife to a sexual intercourse. 7Randall adds that "stranger rapes" tend to be perceived as more severe than marital sexual assaults, given the partners' union and past consent to engage in a sexual relationship. 8For this reason, the images conjured up by domestic violence tend to be centered on physical assault, threats [End Page 540]and mental abuse, rather than on sexual violence. 9Randall skillfully backs up her argument with surveys that show how, at a community level, people tend not to perceive IPSV as domestic violence. 10Randall denounces how this separation has implications on the effectiveness of a legal response in that all the focus is on domestic violence and none on IPSV, making the latter a de factoinvisible crime. 11The consequences are multifold. First, if marital sexual violence is not perceived as amounting to an assault, it ends up being under-reported and even undetected. 12Then, if there is no criminalization of marital rape, the victims are left with no tools to find help and to counteract the long-lasting and negative physical and mental effects of IPSV. Randall brings to light how often IPSV results in consequences that are even more severe than those registered amongst victims of assaults committed by strangers. This is because IPSV victims have to face a sense of betrayal as the damage comes from a trusted loved one—someone that should protect and respect them. 13Randall goes on to address effects that are insufficiently appreciated, such as the phenomenon of revictimization, which is defined as the heightened likelihood for women who were victims of sexual abuse as children to be victims of IPSV later in life as well. 14 A thought-provoking aspect of Randall's analysis is the influence of social norms and gender expectations in women...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,967
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,641

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,005
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0080,006
Communication savante0,0090,005
Science ouverte0,0010,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0040,005
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0250,003

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,008
Tête enseignante GPT0,237
Écart entre enseignants0,230 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2019
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueHuman Rights QuarterlyMême sujetGender, Security, and ConflictTravaux en français237 207