MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2947153372 · doi:10.24321/2393.8307.201902

Exposure to Occupational Air Pollution in the Manufacturing Industries of Bhutan

2019· article· en· W2947153372 on OpenAlexaff
Phuntsho Dendup

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Advanced Research in Civil and Environmental Engineering · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCOVID-19 impact on air quality
Canadian institutionsOntario Ministry of Labour
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAir pollutionBusinessPollutionManufacturingEnvironmental planningEnvironmental scienceMarketing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Airborne pollution effects human health, mainly the respiratory and cardiovascular system. Industrial workers are highly susceptible to those air pollution and particulate matter emitted from their workplaces. The objective of this study is to determine the occupational exposure level of air pollution affecting respirable dust of various parameters in the manufacturing industries of Bhutan. The method used in this study include convenience sampling method and grab sampling method. All the 20 major manufacturing industries located in Phuntsholing, Samtse and Gomtu were selected for this study. However, the working area where possibilities of emitting higher air pollution during the work process within the companies was selected for grab air sampling. The level of respirable dust in the cement plants was found to be 13.1 times higher than Bhutan’s permissible level. Similarly, the respirable dust level in the ferroalloy plants was 2.34 times higher than OSHA and Bhutan’s permissible exposure level and 3.9 times higher than the ACGIH TLV. The level of total particulate matter in ferroalloy, cement and dolomite industries exceeds the Bhutan and OSHA permissible exposure level and ACGIH TLV. This study has found the prevalence of higher concentration level of particulate matter in the working environment of manufacturing industries in Bhutan. Therefore, it is also suggested for study on occupational health effect to build the relationship between exposure level and health effect.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.065

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Advanced Research in Civil and Environmental EngineeringSame topicCOVID-19 impact on air qualityFrench-language works237,207