Toward Automatic Anxiety Detection in Autism: A Real-Time Algorithm for Detecting Physiological Arousal in the Presence of Motion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Anxiety is a significant clinical concern in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) due to its negative impact on physical and psychological health. Treatment of anxiety in ASD remains a challenge due to difficulties with self-awareness and communication of anxiety symptoms. To reduce these barriers to treatment, physiological markers of autonomic arousal, collected through wearable sensors, have been proposed as real-time, objective, and language-free measures of anxiety. A critical limitation of the existing anxiety detection systems is that physiological arousal is not specific to anxiety and can occur with other user states such as physical activity. This can result in false positives, which can hinder the operation of these systems in real-world situations. The objective of this paper was to address this challenge by proposing an approach for real-time detection and mitigation of physical activity effects. METHODS: A novel multiple model Kalman-like filter is proposed to integrate heart rate and accelerometry signals. The filter tracks user heart rate under different motion assumptions and chooses the appropriate model for anxiety detection based on user motion conditions. RESULTS: Evaluation of the algorithm using data from a sample of children with ASD shows a significant reduction in false positives compared to the state-of-the-art, and an overall arousal detection accuracy of 93%. CONCLUSION: The proposed method is able to reduce false detections due to user motion and effectively detect arousal states during movement periods. SIGNIFICANCE: The results add to the growing evidence supporting the feasibility of wearable technologies for anxiety detection and management in naturalistic settings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".