MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2947199621 · doi:10.1063/1.5096990

Surface tension of supercooled water nanodroplets from computer simulations

2019· article· en· W2947199621 on OpenAlexafffund

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Chemical Physics · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMaterial Dynamics and Properties
Canadian institutionsSt. Francis Xavier UniversityMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSupercoolingLaplace pressureSurface tensionPlanarTensor (intrinsic definition)Line (geometry)Surface (topology)Ambient pressureRange (aeronautics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We estimate the liquid-vapor surface tension from simulations of TIP4P/2005 water nanodroplets of size N = 100 to 2880 molecules over a temperature T range of 180 K–300 K. We compute the planar surface tension γp, the curvature-dependent surface tension γs, and the Tolman length δ, via two approaches, one based on the pressure tensor (the “mechanical route”) and the other on the Laplace pressure (the “thermodynamic route”). We find that these two routes give different results for γp, γs, and δ although in all cases, we find that δ ≥ 0 and is independent of T. Nonetheless, the T dependence of γp is consistent between the two routes and with that of Vega and de Miguel [J. Chem. Phys. 126, 154707 (2007)] down to the crossing of the Widom line at 230 K for ambient pressure. Below 230 K, γp rises more rapidly on cooling than predicted from behavior for T ≥ 300 K. We show that the increase in γp at low T is correlated with the emergence of a well-structured random tetrahedral network in our nanodroplet cores and thus that the surface tension can be used as a probe to detect behavior associated with the proposed liquid-liquid phase transition in supercooled water.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Chemical PhysicsSame topicMaterial Dynamics and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207