MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2947214515 · doi:10.1093/pch/pxz066.073

74 Variability on decision to discontinue supplemental oxygen among Canadian Pediatric respirologists in premature patients with BPD: A cross sectional survey study

2019· article· en· W2947214515 on OpenAlexaffabout
Nikytha Antony, Mark Anselmo

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research
Canadian institutionsAlberta Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBronchopulmonary dysplasiaCross-sectional studyDemographicsPopulationPediatricsFamily medicineDemographyGestational agePregnancyEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Approximately 8% of all Canadian births are preterm and one of the most common pulmonary complications associated with prematurity is bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) which is defined as the persistent need for oxygen at 36 weeks post menstrual age or 28 days of postnatal life. Close to half of all premature infants with BPD are discharged from hospital with home oxygen and Pediatric respirologists are commonly involved in the decision of discontinuing home oxygen use after the newborn period. Our aim was to assess whether there is variability among Canadian pediatric respirologists on when to discontinue supplemental oxygen and given the lack of evidence based guidelines we hypothesize that there will be variability in this decision making process. Gathering data on current practices in Canada can help fuel quality improvement projects to help improve standardization and clinical practice guidelines specific to the Canadian population of premature infants with BPD. A cross sectional survey study was completed and anonymous surveys were distributed in both English and French through the Cross Canada respiratory rounds list serve and the Canadian Respiratory conference 2018. Surveys included four oximetry test interpretations, 8 follow up questions on the decision making process and 4 questions on physician demographics. Ethics approval was obtained through the Research and Ethics Board prior to data collection. The survey response rate was 27%. There were responses from 6 provinces, 71% reported having more than 15 patients who required home oxygen use in their practice and 63% had practiced in the field for at least 5 years. The decision to discontinue home oxygen varied amongst Canadian Pediatric respirologists with 29% in favor of discontinuing home oxygen using the 4 provided oximetry tests to 71% against the decision. The decision to discontinue home oxygen did vary based on the province of current work; Alberta had a highest rate of respondents choosing to discontinue home oxygen (47.5%) in comparison to British Columbia and Quebec (18% and 20% respectively). Respirologists who completed their fellowship training in Canada were more likely to discontinue home oxygen compared to respondents who trained in the United States (31% vs 25%). The presence of pulmonary hypertension was rated as being the highest likelihood in affecting the decision to discontinue home oxygen (97%). Close to half of the respondents (42%) reported not being aware of any existing guidelines on supplemental oxygen use and amongst the respondents who did use a guideline, 72% reported using the British Thoracic Society guidelines for home oxygen use in children. This project allowed us to gather data on current practices on home oxygen use decision making amongst Canadian respirologists and informs that there is variability on care that patients receive across the country based on the experience and training of the pediatric respirologists.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.057
Threshold uncertainty score0.129

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.329 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child Health→Same topicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research→French-language works237,207→