An Empirical Model to Estimate Sweep Efficiency of a Surfactant-Alternating-Gas Foam Process in Heterogeneous Reservoirs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A surfactant-alternating-gas (SAG) process is a promising enhanced oil recovery (EOR) method for tight oil reservoirs. In this study, an empirical model is developed to predict the dynamic performance of a SAG process including sweep efficiency of multiple types of well patterns, in which major factors of the SAG process are involved, including gas channeling, reservoir heterogeneity, gravity segregation, and the instability of a foam structure. A novel empirical model is proposed to estimate the recovery factor of a SAG process in typical well patterns, which divides the whole area into three parts based on dominate occupation in situ fluids. Estimating the breakthrough time of each area is the key of this model. A new concept pseudomobility ratio is proposed to convert the negative effect of heterogeneity into unfavorable increment of mobility ratio. Numerical simulation studies are introduced to validate the proposed SAG empirical model. The comparison shows that the SAG performance model is highly consistent with the numerical simulation results calculated by cmg. Sensitivity analysis is introduced to study the effects of variables in the SAG process, including the fluid injection rate, slug size, slug proportion, and reservoir heterogeneity. Oil production estimated by the proposed model is also validated with field production data collected from the Ganguyi SAG project in China, and the growth trend of oil production agrees well with the field data. The proposed model provides a fast approach to predict the dynamic performance of SAG flooding in a field scale, which can be used as a tool to evaluate and optimize current operational parameters.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".