Du contrat individuel de travail en droit québécois : essai en forme de point d’interrogation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le droit civil du travail, c’est-à-dire le droit de la relation contractuelle employeur-employé, a peu changé depuis le début de ce siècle et l’on applique encore aujourd’hui des règles qui, souvent, n’entretiennent guère de rapport avec les réalités contemporaines du travail. Cela, pourtant, n’est pas irrémédiable, notre droit civil, tel qu’incarné dans le Code civil, possédant un dynamisme qui permet d’espérer, et même de justifier, une nécessaire évolution. L’auteur tente d’illustrer cette proposition au moyen d’une remise en question des règles relatives au caractère intuitu personae du contrat de louage de services et à l’impossibilité d’obtenir judiciairement la réintégration de l’employé congédié sans motif. Cette remise en question est fondée à la fois sur l’observation des phénomènes actuels du travail et sur des arguments strictement juridiques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.020 | 0.033 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".