MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2947361896 · doi:10.1109/apec.2019.8722109

A New Power Flow Control Method for Energy Storage Systems in Microgrids (MGs)

2019· article· en· W2947361896 on OpenAlexaff
Hadis Hajebrahimi, Sajjad Makhdoomi Kaviri, Suzan Eren, Alireza Bakhshai

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrogrid Control and Optimization
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVoltage droopSequential quadratic programmingControl theory (sociology)Energy storageVoltageComputer scienceMicrogridNonlinear systemState of chargePower (physics)Quadratic programmingBattery (electricity)Control engineeringEngineeringControl (management)Voltage sourceElectrical engineeringMathematical optimizationMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper introduces a new power flow control method for the energy storage systems used in DC microgrids (MGs). The proposed control method is an adaptive droop control-based method that keeps the DC-bus voltage in a predefined and desired range. In the islanded mode of operation, tightly regulating the bus voltage is very challenging. The proposed control technique utilizes a nonlinear droop profile with four adaptive parameters, which are able to tightly regulate the bus voltage during various changes in loads/sources within a DC MG. In addition, determination of the adaptive parameters are performed by using a nonlinear optimization method. The sequential quadratic programming (SQP) optimization considers both the state of charge (SOC) of the battery and the DC MG voltage to make the control system more reliable and efficient. Simulation and experimental results verify the feasibility of the proposed approach and demonstrate its superior performance in comparison with the conventional controllers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.777
Threshold uncertainty score0.551

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMicrogrid Control and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207