048 A Closer Examination of the Relationship between Erectile Function and Sexual Distress in Men with Prostate Cancer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Erectile difficulties are incredibly common after prostate cancer (PCa) treatment and are frequently associated with high levels of distress. However, the nature of the relationship between erectile function and sexual distress has yet to be carefully examined and largely has been assumed to be a negative linear association, with lower erectile function associated with higher sexual distress. The aim of this study was threefold: (1) to examine the nature of the relationship between erectile function and sexual distress; (2) determine subsets of men based on their levels of erectile function and sexual distress; and (3) examine the psychosexual characteristics of these different subsets of men. A cross-section of 233 men after PCa treatment who were sexually active, with ages between 37 and 83 years (M = 64.90, SD = 7.50). Participants completed an anonymous online survey containing demographic, health, and sexuality related questions. More specifically, they completed measures of erectile function, sexual distress, depression, sexual values, sexual satisfaction, protective buffering, and partner involvement in their sexual life.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".