MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2947414751 · doi:10.1002/cjce.23498

Structure Optimization of Vessel Seawater Desulphurization Scrubber Based on CFD and SVM‐GA Methods

2019· article· en· W2947414751 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Dewei Yang, Wenqi Zhong, Xi Chen, Guanghong Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndustrial Gas Emission Control
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsScrubberComputational fluid dynamicsFlue-gas desulfurizationAbsorption (acoustics)Support vector machineProcess engineeringChemistryComputer scienceEnvironmental scienceMaterials scienceEngineeringWaste managementArtificial intelligenceAerospace engineeringComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The miniaturization of the scrubber used in vessel flue gas desulphurization is a critical issue. In this study, the structure optimization of the vessel desulphurization scrubber based on CFD (computational fluid dynamics) and the SVM‐GA (support vector machine and genetic algorithm) is performed and a miniaturized scrubber design with the same desulphurization efficiency as large scrubbers is obtained. First, the seawater SO 2 absorption process in a vessel desulphurization scrubber is investigated using the CFD‐DPM method, and the effects of the operating and structural parameters on the desulphurization efficiency η are discussed in detail. Results show that η is positively correlated to the absorption area height, H 2 , and the spray level number, N , and η first increases and then decreases with an increase in the scrubber diameter, D 1 , as well as the inlet flue angle, θ . Then, a prediction model of η considering D 1 , H 2 , θ , and N is established and validated using the SVM with the simulation data. Finally, D 1 , H 2 , θ , and N are optimized using the GA method based on the SVM model. The results show that the volume of the absorption area, V ab , can be reduced by 30 % while maintaining the same η through the use of this optimization method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.135
Threshold uncertainty score0.370

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicIndustrial Gas Emission ControlFrench-language works237,207