Robotic Walkers for Children and Youth with Cerebral Palsy: A Review of Past Successes and Ongoing Advancement
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Each child with a disability deserves the support required to achieve their maximum physical potential, optimal participation and an active lifestyle throughout their lifespan. In this paper, we aim to highlight past successes, present work and share a vision for future advancements in robotic gait technologies that enable walking in children and youth with severe physical disabilities. We will summarize work which demonstrates how a robotic walker with a lift and body weight support system has shown great promise in mobilization, exercise and participation in youth and young adults with Cerebral Palsy (CP). This study was conducted in 3 phases; 1) a case study, 2) a pilot study evaluating mobility in a clinical setting, and 3) a study focusing on training and participation in a community setting. Secondly, we will describe the planned assessment of the Trexo Plus, a walker and wearable lower extremity robotic device combination, in younger children with significant physical involvement secondary to CP. This device allows precise repetition of normal gait patterns while controlling range of motion at the hip, knee and ankle. Lastly, we will highlight international innovative robotic work which has produced a novel robotic platform with a partial body weight support system (PBWS), active system for adapting hip height and an exoskeleton with joint motion control. A multimodal human-robot interface (MHRI) accompanies the unique walker system which assesses intent to move, posture and balance and gait patterns. This system has the potential to allow therapists to construct and precisely evaluate unique robot facilitated programming. There is a new generation of robotic devices providing the means for individuals with CP to walk independently. With a look to the future, we endeavour to evaluate and facilitate the development of this robotic technology as it is integrated into clinical care, activity enhancement and community participation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it