MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Real-world demographic and clinical characteristics of patients diagnosed with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in the United States (US).

2019· article· en· W2947430416 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaoqin Yang, François Laliberté, Guillaume Germain, Monika Raut, Mei Sheng Duh, Shuvayu S. Sen, Dominique Lejeune, Cristi Cavanaugh, Kaushal Desai, Phillippe Armand

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsGroup for Research in Decision Analysis
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDiffuse large B-cell lymphomaInternal medicineLymphomaComorbidityInternational Prognostic IndexDiagnosis codeOncologyPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

e18347 Background: DLBCL, the most common type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma in the US, is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. In October 2015, DLBCL was differentiated from other related lymphoma entities with the advent of ICD-10-CM DLBCL-specific codes. With limited real-world data on patients (pts) with DLBCL in the modern treatment era, this study was conducted to characterize these pts. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted using the Optum Clinformatics Data Mart database (01/2013–03/2018). Pts ≥ 18 years of age with ≥ 1 hospitalization or ≥ 2 outpatient visits with an ICD-10-CM diagnosis code for DLBCL (or an antecedent diagnosis of other lymphoma, which may have been assigned before confirmation of DLBCL) after October 1st, 2015 (index date) and no prior ICD-9-CM code for unspecified DLBCL were identified as incident. Pts with an ICD-9-CM code for unspecified DLBCL before October 2015 (index date) were classified as prevalent. At least 12 months of continuous enrollment pre-index date (baseline period) was required. Pts with ICD-10-CM code for primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL), baseline diagnoses of other malignancies such as Hodgkin lymphoma and multiple myeloma were excluded. Characteristics, including baseline comorbidities, healthcare resource utilization, and costs were assessed. Results: Among 4,074 DLBCL pts (3,201 incident; 873 prevalent), mean age ± standard deviation (SD) was 71 ± 12 years; 46% were female. Incident and prevalent pts had mean Charlson comorbidity index scores of 2.7 and 2.3, respectively. Most common baseline Elixhauser comorbidities were hypertension (68.4%), diabetes (31.1%), and cardiac arrhythmia (25.3%) in incident pts and hypertension (62.5%), diabetes (28.3%), and chronic pulmonary disease (20.6%) in prevalent pts. Mean ± SD number of baseline hospitalizations was 0.32 ± 0.83 and 0.21 ± 0.49 in incident and prevalent pts, respectively. Total mean ± SD baseline healthcare costs (before diagnosis) were $24,621 ± 45,628 for incident pts and $19,137 ± 29,307 for prevalent pts. Conclusions: This study documents substantial co-morbid and economic burden of incident as well as prevalent pts with DLBCL.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.376
Teacher spread0.340 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→