Effect of carbonization temperature on the grindability of carbonaceous material produced from different coals
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Carbonization experiments were conducted on four kinds of sub‐bituminous coal particles at a temperature range of 450–1200 °C. The effect of treating temperature on the grindability of produced carbonaceous materials was investigated, and its mechanism was analyzed through various means. Results show that the grindability of all coals, whether caking or slightly‐caking, exhibit the same variation trend with an increase in carbonization temperature. Moreover, the entire process can be divided into four stages. (1) After the most intense devolatilization stage, the grindability of carbonaceous material exhibited different degrees of increase compared with that of raw coal because of the development of a pore structure. (2) The first significant decrease in the grindability occurred from the plastic stage to the complete resolidification of the coal matrix. (3) After the aromatic polycondensation stage accompanied by a large amount of H2 release, the coal molecular structure became compact, such that the grindability of semi‐coke considerably decreased again. (4) At high temperatures, the coal matrix underwent graphitization, which changed semi‐coke to coke. The molecular structure of coal became ordered, and the grindability decreased again. The analysis shows that a change in the internal chemical structure of carbonaceous material has a much more pronounced effect on grindability than a change in its pore structure, except in the first stage. The constant compaction and regularization of the coal molecular structure continued happening throughout the entire process and play a decisive role in the change in grindability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".