MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2947462491 · doi:10.1109/jlt.2019.2910519

Improved Soliton Amplitude Estimation via the Continuous Spectrum

2019· article· en· W2947462491 on OpenAlexafffund
Qun Zhang, Frank R. Kschischang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Lightwave Technology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMathematicsNonlinear systemSolitonContinuous spectrumTransmission (telecommunications)AlgorithmSpectrum (functional analysis)Continuous phase modulationReduction (mathematics)Euclidean distanceFourier transformComputer scienceMathematical analysisTelecommunicationsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In soliton communication systems, the continuous nonlinear spectrum, ideally zero, is conventionally ignored at the receiver. In this paper, we exploit correlation between the received continuous spectrum and perturbations of the discrete soliton eigenvalue. We propose four estimation schemes, classified into two categories, one based on the nonlinear Fourier transform (NFT) and the other based on minimum Euclidean distance. Both categories comprise two schemes, one that exploits the received continuous spectral function to achieve improved estimation and one that does not. Numerical simulations demonstrate that significant reduction in estimation error can be achieved when the continuous spectrum is exploited, translating into improved information transmission rates of up to 46% compared to the reference NFT-based scheme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Lightwave TechnologySame topicOptical Network TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207