Postural and muscular adaptations to repetitive simulated work
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Complex repetitive tasks are common in the workplace and have been associated with upper extremity disorders. The purpose of this study was to examine the progressive effects of highly repetitive work on joint kinematics and muscle activity of the trunk and upper extremity. Fifteen healthy men performed 60 one-minute cycles of 4 simulated automotive-related tasks. Electromyography of eight muscles and kinematics of the trunk and right upper extremity were collected. Data were analysed at 12-min intervals and divided into a complete work cycle. The time to complete the work cycle decreased by 6.3 s over the trials. Peak shoulder flexion decreased and peak elbow flexion increased during the work cycle. Muscle activity magnitude and variability was influenced by time during the repetitive tasks. This study found adaptations to highly repetitive but light work in only 1 h; redistributing muscle demands within the shoulder over time may reduce muscle fatigue development.Practitioner Summary: While the work was not strenuous, we were able to demonstrate muscular and postural adaptations in a single hour of simulated work. By evaluating both the whole work cycle and the sub-tasks, we aim to develop new methods for evaluating the risk of complex tasks in prolonged repetitive work.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".