MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2947606660 · doi:10.5220/0007766905620568

Using an Intelligent Vision System for Obstacle Detection in Winter Condition

2019· article· en· W2947606660 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the 5th International Conference on Vehicle Technology and Intelligent Transport Systems · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Measurement and Detection Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
Fundersnot available
KeywordsObstacleComputer scienceComputer visionArtificial intelligenceMachine visionGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper explores the performance of an Advanced Driving Assistance System (ADAS) during navigation in urban traffic and a winter condition. The selected ADAS technology, Mobileye, has been integrated into a hydrogen electric vehicle. A set of three cameras (visible spectrum) has also been installed to give a surrounding view of the test vehicle. The tests were carried out during the dusk as well as in the night in winter condition. Using Matlab, the messages provided by Mobileye system have been analyzed. More than 2800 samples (short sequences of 5s Mobileye messages) have been processed and compared with the corresponding video samples recorded by the three cameras. In average, the selected ADAS device was able to provide 99% of true positive vehicle detection and classification, even in poor ambient lighting condition in winter. However, 72% of samples involving a pedestrian was correctly classified.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.286
Threshold uncertainty score0.566

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it