MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2947613909 · doi:10.1186/s12870-019-1780-4

Correction to: MeioCapture: an efficient method for staging and isolation of meiocytes in the prophase I sub-stages of meiosis in wheat

2019· erratum· en· W2947613909 on OpenAlexaff
Arun S. K. Shunmugam, Venkatesh Bollina, Stefanie Dukowic‐Schulze, Pankaj Bhowmik, Chris Ambrose, James D. Higgins, Curtis Pozniak, Andrew Sharpe, Kevin Rozwadowski, Sateesh Kagale

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Plant Biology · 2019
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant Reproductive Biology
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaUniversity of SaskatchewanNational Research Council CanadaGlobal Institute for Water SecuritySaskatchewan Research Council (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMeiocyteBiologyMeiosisProphaseIsolation (microbiology)Computational biologyGeneticsBioinformaticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Following publication of the original article [1], a reader spotted an incorrect citation of the reference 14 [2] in the 'Background'. The male meiocyte isolation work described in this article [2] was carried out in rice and not in Brassica as originally stated in the 'Background' [1]. Thus, the following amendment to the Background section should be noted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.125
Threshold uncertainty score0.769

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC Plant BiologySame topicPlant Reproductive BiologyFrench-language works237,207