MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2947635406 · doi:10.4000/books.pusl.21649

Le « dogme » catholique comme grammaire d’agapè

2005· book-chapter· fr· W2947635406 on OpenAlexaff
José Reding

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligious Education and Schools
Canadian institutionsSociété Canadienne de Théologie
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

« Une intelligence sans bonté est comme un costume de soie portée par un cadavre ».C. Bobin Petite histoire suggestive Sur le terrain de football, les joueurs s’échauffaient, s’échangeaient le ballon, tiraient au but. Un trio d’arbitres monta sur le pré. Les joueurs se placèrent, selon une stratégie mûrie... L’arbitre siffla et la partie commença. Dans les tribunes, nous étions deux amis, assis l’un près de l’autre et supporters chacun d’une équipe différente. Lorsque les rouges marquèrent un...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.730
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicReligious Education and SchoolsFrench-language works237,207