MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2947727115 · doi:10.1093/pch/pxz066.011

12 Children with Bronchiolitis admitted to a Community Hospital Emergency Department: A Retrospective Chart Review

2019· article· en· W2947727115 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Vinay Kukreti, Sarah Tsimelkas, Mika Nonoyama, Efroseni Papaconstantinou

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRespiratory viral infections research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmergency departmentBronchiolitisAcademic communityMedicineChartRetrospective cohort studyPediatricsLibrary sciencePsychiatrySurgeryComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bronchiolitis is the leading cause of infant hospitalization worldwide and affects more than one-third of children, 0 to 2 years old. Despite the common nature of bronchiolitis, and the availability of clinical practice guidelines, there is wide variation in the clinical management, and how it is diagnosed and treated. Utilization of unnecessary investigations and ineffective medication and interventions for the management of bronchiolitis have been costly for the health care system and reflect significant morbidity and burden for families. Studies have shown that AAP guidelines have decreased the use of diagnostics and medications (bronchodilators, steroids, antibiotics) for children with bronchiolitis in tertiary care centers however there is a low uptake of AAP bronchiolitis recommendations in smaller community hospitals which highlight the challenges in changing clinical behaviour and culture in these centers. Bronchiolitis is a leading cause of infant hospitalization with wide variation in its diagnosis and management, especially in smaller community hospitals. The objective of this study is to describe children admitted to a community-based hospital emergency department (ED) for bronchiolitis and its management. This retrospective chart review took place at a community-based hospital (Lakeridge) in Ontario. Study was approved by the research ethics boards of Lakeridge Health and University of Ontario Institute of Technology. The medical charts of children who visited Lakeridge Health EDs (Oshawa, Bowmanville and Port Perry sites) between January 1 to September 30, 2015 were identified. Outcomes included demographic information, admission and discharge date, reason for admission, ED disposition, presenting and ongoing symptoms, chest x-rays (CXRs) and interventions. The RDAI at Lakeridge Health is not directly assessed therefore total RDAI score was calculated using documented assessments. Patient characteristics and variables were described using means and standard deviations (SD), counts and proportions. Chi-square tests (proportions) and independent t-test (continuous variables) were used to compare children who had a CXR versus those who did not; provided oral antibiotics versus those who did not; and admitted to hospital or discharged home. A p<0.05 was considered significant. A p<0.05 was considered significant. The mean (SD) age of the 100 children was 10.6 (8.4) months, with n=41 (41%) females. The primary reason for admission was respiratory distress (38%).67 % had a CXR done. 17% were given oral antibiotics, 65% inhaled bronchodilators, 19% oral steroids, and 16% supplemental oxygen. More children had moderate to severe respiratory distress 43% while 23% had mild distress 34% were not reported in the chart. The majority of children (81%) were discharged home with the balance admitted (maximum length of stay of 6 days).The mean (SD) total calculated RDAI score was 4.98 (2.43); range 0 to 11.There was a significant difference in total calculated RDAI score between those given oral antibiotics (mean [95% confidence interval], 6.35 [4.96 to 7.75]) versus not given oral antibiotics (4.70 [4.20 to 5.20]), p=0.01.Those who received CXR had a significantly higher supplemental oxygen flowrate (1.4 [0.6–2.1] litres per minute (lpm)) versus those who did not (0.15 [-0.05–0.35] lpm), p=0.002.There was a significant difference in the physical appearance on admission (p=0.04): more children who did not receive CXR were calm and normal (88%) versus the CXR group (58%); and more children in the CXR group were in the tri-pod position (12%) or head bobbing (19%) versus those who were not (3% and 9% respectively). A large number of children admitted to a community based ED for bronchiolitis received unnecessary CXR, bronchodilators and steroids. Development of institutional or health-region specific clinical practice guidelines that considers local culture, and includes collaboration with all stakeholders, may aid in the optimal diagnosis and treatment of bronchiolitis for community-based EDs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.058
Threshold uncertainty score0.116

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child Health→Same topicRespiratory viral infections research→French-language works237,207→