MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2947776209 · doi:10.3917/spub.190.0257

Les forêts et la santé publique : l’expérience et les espérances autrichiennes. Le projet Green Care Wald

2019· article· fr· W2947776209 on OpenAlexaff
Gerhard Mannsberger

Bibliographic record

VenueSanté Publique · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth and Medical Studies
Canadian institutionsMinistère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Austrian authorities, including the Austrian Forest Research Centre [1], have been developing the Green Care Wald project since 2014. Its aim is to improve wellbeing in Austrian society by bringing together all the initiatives and activities related to forests so as to create additional sources of income and by encouraging rural development. A description of the project's background (the Vienna resolutions of 2003, the Green Public Health initiative conducted in cooperation with the Vienna Medical University and BOKU), its development and achievements (in particular the practical advice leaflets) is followed by more general considerations on the promising future prospects for interaction between forests and human health.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.771
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.409
Teacher spread0.380 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSanté PubliqueSame topicHealth and Medical StudiesFrench-language works237,207