MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2947776874 · doi:10.1136/ebnurs-2018-103058

Expanding midwifery’s role to improve perinatal mental healthcare access

2019· letter· en· W2947776874 on OpenAlexaff
Cindy‐Lee Dennis, Simone N. Vigod

Bibliographic record

VenueEvidence-Based Nursing · 2019
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsObstetricsMental healthcareMental healthNursingHealth carePsychologyMedicinePolitical sciencePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Commentary on: Viveiros CJ, Darling EK. Perceptions of barriers to accessing perinatal mental healthcare in midwifery: a scoping review. Midwifery 2019;70:106–118. Despite increased awareness of perinatal mental health issues, management remain suboptimal. Barriers are diverse and areas to target for greatest impact …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.058
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.066

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.058
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.005
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0450.036
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.383
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEvidence-Based NursingSame topicMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumFrench-language works237,207