Spontaneous coronary artery dissection in cardiac sarcoidosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) is increasingly recognized as a cause of diverse cardiac manifestations. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) has emerged as an important cause of acute coronary syndrome especially among young females. The prevalence of sarcoidosis in the causal spectrum of SCAD has not been described before but sarcoidosis is cited as a potential yet rare cause of SCAD. We aimed to examine the frequency and characteristics of SCAD in CS. Searching two prospective CS registries with 481 CS patients, we found only one case of manifest SCAD. She is a 61-year-old female previously diagnosed with endomyocardial biopsy confirmed CS. She presented with chest pain and elevated troponin. Coronary angiogram revealed two-vessel SCAD. Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography scan showed likely reactivation of CS. The patient was treated with dual antiplatelet therapy and immunosuppression. Repeat angiogram showed complete resolution of the coronary lesions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".