MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2947818401 · doi:10.1080/07060661.2019.1625444

Effect of <i>Brassica</i> crop-based biofumigation on soilborne disease suppression in woody ornamentals

2019· article· en· W2947818401 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Plant Pathology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Disease Management Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Food and AgricultureSouthern SAREU.S. Department of Agriculture
KeywordsBrassicaBrassica carinataBiologyAgronomyOrnamental plantWhite mustardHorticultureRhizoctonia solaniSinapis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Soilborne diseases are the most economically important problem for ornamental nursery producers in the southeastern United States. The use of cover crops selected based on their biofumigant activity to improve soilborne disease management in woody ornamental production was assessed. Replicated pot bioassays were established as greenhouse trials in sterilized clay loam soil which had pre-existing populations of Rhizoctonia solani or Phytophthora nicotianae. Selected Brassica crops were seeded directly into the soil and flowering cover crops were incorporated 15 cm deep into the same pots and covered with polyethylene for 2 or 4 weeks. Volatile compounds released during the biofumigation process were collected at different time intervals. Soil type and moisture affected ITC release. Hydrangea or viburnum rooted cuttings were grown in the biofumigated (2 or 4 weeks) and non-biofumigated control pots and root rot disease severity was evaluated at the end of each bioassay. Yellow mustard (Sinapis alba, ‘White gold’), turnip (Brassica rapa, ‘Purple top forage’), arugula (Eruca vesicaria ssp. sativa, ‘Astro’), Mighty mustard (B. juncea, ‘Pacific gold’), rape (B. napus, ‘Dwarf essex’), mustard green (B. carinata, ‘Amara’) and brown mustard (B. juncea, ‘Kodiak’) cover crops were effective in suppressing R. solani and P. nicotianae. Similar disease suppression was observed whether biofumigation was performed for 2 or 4 weeks. Phytotoxicity was not observed on viburnum and hydrangea woody ornamental plants after either the 2 or 4 weeks biofumigation period with any of the tested cover crops. Viburnum and hydrangea grown in mustard green-, arugula- and turnip-incorporated soil had significantly higher whole plant and root fresh weights compared with the inoculated, non-biofumigated control plants. Although mustard green and arugula are not used currently as commercial biofumigation cover crops, they also showed promise for controlling soilborne pathogens of woody ornamental plants under greenhouse conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.414
Threshold uncertainty score0.228

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it