MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2947840537 · doi:10.1029/2019jb017375

Heat Flow in Earth's Core From Invariant Electrical Resistivity of Fe‐Si on the Melting Boundary to 9 GPa: Do Light Elements Matter?

2019· article· en· W2947840537 on OpenAlexafffund
Reynold E. Silber, Richard A. Secco, Wenjun Yong, Joshua A. H. Littleton

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGeomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Foundation for Innovation
KeywordsElectrical resistivity and conductivityMaterials scienceInner coreThermodynamicsCondensed matter physicsAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ChemistryComposite materialPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The electrical resistivity and thermal conductivity of liquid Fe alloys are the least constrained parameters in Earth's outer core (OC). These parameters are important as they modulate energy budget available for the geodynamo and affect the spatiotemporal evolution of the core. We report results of electrical resistivity measurements on solid and liquid Fe‐4.5 wt%Si from 3–9 GPa using a large volume multianvil press. The internally modified 18/11 octahedron cell was used to maintain the geometry of the liquid sample and to delay the onset of contamination. Electrical resistivity of solid Fe‐4.5Si decreases steadily with pressure and is very sensitive to increasing temperature‐driven onset of phase transitions. Along the melting boundary and within error, electrical resistivity remains constant and assumes the same value of 120 μΩcm as observed in pure liquid Fe. The results are interpreted in the context of icosahedral short‐range order (ISRO) structures that exhibit higher concentration with increasing pressure. Along the melting line, the increasing concentration of ISROs reduces charge carrier mean free path and prevents decrease of electrical resistivity with increasing pressure as seen in liquid metals, Cu, Ag, and Au, which do not have ISROs. In light of recent developments in understanding of the structure and dynamics of liquid transition metals and alloys, we postulate that our findings are applicable to other Fe alloys in the OC with small light element (C, S, and O) content. We calculated an adiabatic heat flow of 9.4–12 TW at the OC‐CMB interface, which admits thermal convection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.845
Threshold uncertainty score0.524

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research Solid EarthSame topicGeomagnetism and Paleomagnetism StudiesFrench-language works237,207