MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2947846819 · doi:10.7202/1059592ar

La circulation facilitée des migrants défunts. Réflexions à partir de la frontière mexicano-étatsunienne1

2019· article· fr· W2947846819 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Françoise Lestage

Bibliographic record

VenueDiversité urbaine · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration and Labor Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAgence Nationale de la Recherche
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article postule que les politiques nationales et supranationales facilitent la mobilité des migrants défunts alors qu’elles contraignent et limitent de plus en plus la mobilité des migrants vivants, surtout quand ils sont malades, marginaux ou originaires de pays pauvres. Cette hypothèse est défendue à partir de deux cas mexicains-étatsuniens en montrant : a) qu’une fois décédés, migrants et marginaux, placés en dehors de l’ensemble des citoyens de leur vivant, sont autorisés par les États à le réintégrer ; b) que, si les États se fondent sur les lois en vigueur pour la circulation des vivants, lorsqu’il s’agit de celle des morts, ils s’appuient sur des valeurs universelles qui rendent légitime l’appartenance des défunts à une communauté nationale plus large.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.642
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiversité urbaineSame topicMigration and Labor DynamicsFrench-language works237,207