MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2947880045 · doi:10.7202/1058581ar

La vérité et le statut juridique de la personne en droit québécois

2019· article· fr· W2947880045 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Michèle Rivet

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue générale de droit · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Health and Technologies
Canadian institutionsRéseau Technoscience
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

À partir du moment où la vérité biologique n’est plus unique, le droit, dont l’objectif ultime est de vouloir faire triompher celle-ci ne sait plus que faire. Bouleversement total des notions séculairement acquises où l’interrogation en droit civil de la filiation tenait essentiellement à savoir qui était le père. Mais cette segmentation de la biologie pose également problème dans les constituantes mêmes de la personne lorsqu’elle se mêle de modifier, au moins extérieurement, l’être humain. L’auteur étudie dans une première partie la procréation « éclatée » : insémination artificielle, fécondation in vitro et transfert d’embryons, mère porteuse, pour aborder, en deuxième lieu, la sexualité « éclatée » ou le transsexualisme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.051
Threshold uncertainty score0.126

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0060.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue générale de droitSame topicReproductive Health and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207