Donkey pericardium compares favorably with commercial xenopericardia used in the manufacture of transcatheter heart valves
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has gained considerable acceptance in the past decade due to its lower risks than conventional open-heart surgery. However, the deformation and delamination of the leaflets during the crimping procedure have raised questions about the durability and long-term serviceability of the pericardium tissue from which the leaflets are made. The collagen architecture, wall thickness and mechanical properties of donkey pericardium were investigated to assess its suitability as an alternative material for the manufacture of heart valves. Coupons sampled from different locations of donkey pericardium were investigated. Bovine, equine, and porcine pericardium specimens served as controls. The donkey pericardium had a similar surface morphology to that of the control pericardia except for the wavy topology on both the fibrous and serous sides. The average thickness of donkey pericardium (ca. 120 µm) was significantly lower than that from bovine (375 µm) and equine (410 µm), but slightly higher than that from porcine (99 µm) specimens. The interlaced wavy collagen bundles in the pericardium were composed of collagen fibers about 100 nm in diameter. This unique structure ensures that the donkey pericardium has a comparable ultimate tensile strength (UTS) and a much higher failure strain than the commercial pericardia used for the manufacture of heart valves. The donkey pericardium has an organized wavy collagen bundle architecture similar to that of bovine pericardium and has a satisfactory UTS and high failure strain. The thin and strong donkey pericardium might be a good candidate valve leaflet material for TAVI.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".