013 Pelvic Floor Biometry Assessed Using 3D Translabial Ultrasound in Women with Vulvodynia Submitted to Physical Therapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Vulvodynia is a prevalent chronic vulvar pain which has strong negative effects over quality of life of women and their partners. Pelvic floor muscles (PFM) hypertonicity is known to play an important role in its pathophysiology. For many years, studies investigating whether physical therapy was efficient on changing muscle status of PFM of women with vulvodynia used digital and electromyography assessments, with inconsistent findings. The four-dimensional translabial ultrasound (4D-TLUS) is proven to be efficient on measuring biometry of PFM. Recent studies found that biometric measures of PFM of women with vulvodynia differ from those of healthy controls. However, there is a lack of scientific evidence of whether physical therapy is effective on promoting changes on PFM of women with vulvodynia. This knowledge would contribute to improve knowledge about the mechanism throughout physical therapy is effective for treating women with vulvodynia, and to guide future studies aiming to increase effect of treatment for this disabling condition.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".