MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2947914833 · doi:10.4000/books.ies.2170

La recherche anthropologique dans l’enseignement en travail social

2018· book-chapter· fr· W2947914833 on OpenAlexaff
Laurence Ossipow

Bibliographic record

VenueÉditions ies eBooks · 2018
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, sociology, and vocational training
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Labour, Employment and Social Solidarity
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A Sabine Voélin et Gaëlle Aeby, qui ont enseigné en même temps que moi la sociologie et l’anthropologie dans le module C4, ainsi qu’à Milena Chimienti et Anne Lavanchy, qui ont repris et développé avec brio ces enseignements lorsque j’ai dû les abandonner pour d’autres responsabilités. Introduction Des projets de recherche ont toujours été menés depuis la création du CERES (Centre de recherche sociale) en 1968. Toutefois, depuis que l’Institut d’études sociales (IES) s’est transformé en 2004 ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.054

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0060.014
Scholarly communication0.0090.009
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0040.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.538
GPT teacher head0.495
Teacher spread0.043 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉditions ies eBooksSame topicEducation, sociology, and vocational trainingFrench-language works237,207