MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2947917231 · doi:10.26906/sunz.2019.2.032

ЕНЕРГООЩАДНИЙ ІНКУБАТОР ДЛЯ ФЕРМЕРСЬКИХ ТА ПРИСАДИБНИХ ГОСПОДАРСТВ

2019· article· uk· W2947917231 on OpenAlexaff
V. Borshch, O. Borshch, V. Khaniukov, Y. Oliinyk

Bibliographic record

VenueСистеми управління навігації та зв’язку Збірник наукових праць · 2019
Typearticle
Languageuk
FieldEngineering
TopicMilitary Technology and Strategies
Canadian institutionsHatch (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The production facilities of the modern park of industrial, farm and home incubators are analyzed; the basic technical problems of their design are determined. The imperfect equipment of domestic domestic and practical absence of farm incubators as well as their relatively high energy consumption significantly restrain the production of agricultural poultry production. On the basis of the analysis of the heat transfer equation through the walls of the enclosing structure of the incubator, the main factors that significantly affect the thermal energy loss are determined. The conclusion is made on the reduction of thermal losses by making the enclosure design of the incubator on the basis of modern heat-insulating materials and replacement of the electromechanical system of the rotation of the incubation material. The design of an original energy-efficient incubator, which can be made both in farm and household implements and used on small farms and farms, is described. For the automatic local and remote control of the microclimate of the incubator an "intelligent" automatic system is developed. The use of a personal computer in conjunction with the network of devices "TRC 02 Universal+" of domestic production allows representing the measured values of the parameters of the process of incubation in digital and graphical forms, as well as locally and remotely control the parameters. As a mechanism for inverting the incubation material, a tray with gravitational turning is used, which reduces electricity consumption and simplifies the process of turning the incubation material.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueСистеми управління навігації та зв’язку Збірник наукових працьSame topicMilitary Technology and StrategiesFrench-language works237,207