MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2947946700 · doi:10.1097/sga.0000000000000469

PROBIOTICS FOR THE PREVENTION OF CLOSTRIDIUM DIFFICILE-ASSOCIATED DIARRHEA IN ADULTS AND CHILDREN

2019· review· en· W2947946700 on OpenAlexaffabout
Chloe Gaines, Jerrel Moore

Bibliographic record

VenueGastroenterology Nursing · 2019
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicViral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology
Canadian institutionsCochrane
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCochrane LibraryMedicineNursingSystematic reviewHealth careMEDLINECochrane collaborationFamily medicineAlternative medicinePathologyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chloe Gaines, PhD, RN, FNP-BC, is Professor, Prairie View A&M University, Houston, Texas, and a member of the Cochrane Nursing Care (CNC). Jerrel Moore, PhD, is Assistant Professor, Prairie View A&M University, Houston, Texas. Correspondence to: Chloe Gaines, PhD, RN, FNP-BC, Prairie View A&M University, 6436 Fannin St, Houston, TX 77030 ([email protected]). THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF GASTROENTEROLOGY NURSES AND ASSOCIATES, INC. AND THE CANADIAN SOCIETY OF GASTROENTEROLOGY NURSES AND ASSOCIATESDEDICATED TO THE SAFE AND EFFECTIVE PRACTICE OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND ENDOSCOPY NURSINGThe authors declare no conflicts of interest.The Mission of the Cochrane Nursing Care Field (CNCF) is to improve health outcomes through increasing the use of the Cochrane Library and supporting Cochrane's role by providing an evidence base for nurses and related healthcare professionals involved in delivering, leading, or researching nursing care. The CNCF produces "Cochrane Corner" columns (summaries of recent nursing care-relevant Cochrane Reviews) that are regularly published in collaborating nursing care-related journals. Information on the processes this Field has developed can be accessed at: http://cncf.cochrane.org/evidence-transfer-program-review-summaries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.950
Threshold uncertainty score0.916

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGastroenterology NursingSame topicViral gastroenteritis research and epidemiologyFrench-language works237,207