MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2947958109

The use of International Suppliers and the effects it has on Just-In-Time delivery and Industrial Construction Processes

2017· article· en· W2947958109 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueStudent Research Proceedings · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBIM and Construction Integration
Canadian institutionsMacEwan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSupply chainBusinessFlexibility (engineering)Rationalization (economics)Lead timeProcess managementSupply chain managementRisk analysis (engineering)Industrial organizationOperations managementMarketingEngineeringEconomics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The use of International Suppliers and the effects it has on Just-In-Time delivery and Industrial Construction Processes Through the advancement of information technology (IT) over the past few decades, supply chains have been able to streamline opportunities to grow their success, through the increased availability of international suppliers, and new process techniques, such as just-in-time management. International suppliers have been effective as they often lead to lower costs, and flexibility in product design. Supply base rationalization of both domestic and international suppliers, has been identified as a key opportunity to streamline supply chain operations. Many supply chains have also re-designed their processes in order to include the just-in-time concept, to reduce the often high holding costs, improve waste reduction, and provide less capital investment. However, construction projects often face many challenges in conforming to these standards and practices. Inherently, construction projects are prone to high waste levels of materials, and in order to reduce these to manageable levels, lean processes have been implemented to support the completion of a project. This combination of these concepts has shown to negatively affect the completion of projects, specifically in areas of quality, cost, and future operational challenges. Through aspects of data analytics, common practices can be analyzed through aspects of supplier selection, delivery system management, material waste, and cost savings/ increases, as well as effective data mining initiatives of current and historical projects. Initial research has also identified the possible advantage of the Internet of Things (IoT) and other innovative technology in order to effectively monitor and track current and future opportunities for growth and improvement within construction projects. Discipline: Supply Chain Management Faculty Mentor: Dr. Joong Son

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.259
Threshold uncertainty score0.876

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.104
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it