Dynamic modelling and predictive control for the sequential collaborative reactors of cobalt removal process under time‐varying conditions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The accuracy of the process model directly affects the performance of the model‐based controller. In zinc hydrometallurgy, the overall dynamics of the cobalt removal process can hardly be described by a fixed model since there are a series of interconnected reactors working together under time‐varying inlet and reaction conditions. In this study, an interacting continuously stirred tank reactors (ICSTR) model is developed to describe the cooperative relationship of these cascaded reactors. Considering the time‐varying inlet and reaction conditions, the reaction surface conversion coefficient is defined and incorporated into the ICSTR model, and the kernel partial least squares (KPLS) is employed to update the dynamic model online. The effectiveness of the time‐varying ICSTR model is validated using industrial data. Based on the proposed time‐varying ICSTR model, a predictive controller is designed to realize the optimal operation of the cobalt removal process. Simulation results indicate that compared with conventional predictive control and manual manipulation, the time‐varying ICSTR model‐based predictive control method can not only maintain the outlet cobalt ion concentration but also reduce the zinc dust dosage.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".